<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Track Layout Geometry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/</link>
	<description>Building a brighter tomorrow with LEGO® bricks</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>No, the curved track (or switches for that matter) can't be locked down onto the studs.  The baseplates are shown only to illustrate the geometry.

For example when the BayLTC does a layout, we usually do not lock down the track anywhere.  It's heavy enough to stay in place fairly well by itself.  But we have found that if you want to lock the track down at all, it's best to insert plates under the track wherever you do so.  That way, the straight, parallel parts are locked down but elevated one plate height, so that the curves and switches won't bulge upward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the curved track (or switches for that matter) can&#8217;t be locked down onto the studs.  The baseplates are shown only to illustrate the geometry.</p>
<p>For example when the BayLTC does a layout, we usually do not lock down the track anywhere.  It&#8217;s heavy enough to stay in place fairly well by itself.  But we have found that if you want to lock the track down at all, it&#8217;s best to insert plates under the track wherever you do so.  That way, the straight, parallel parts are locked down but elevated one plate height, so that the curves and switches won&#8217;t bulge upward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-3273</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-3273</guid>
		<description>Hello Bill,
I was looking at your track layout geometry page which seemed to show curved track locked down on 48 x 48 baseplates. Can you explain how this is done? I don't see how it is possible to lock down curved track in the same way that it is possible to lock down straight track on one of those baseplates.
Best wishes
Graham</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bill,<br />
I was looking at your track layout geometry page which seemed to show curved track locked down on 48 x 48 baseplates. Can you explain how this is done? I don&#8217;t see how it is possible to lock down curved track in the same way that it is possible to lock down straight track on one of those baseplates.<br />
Best wishes<br />
Graham</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-2171</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 08:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-2171</guid>
		<description>Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brickpile.com/2006/11/02/track-layout-geometry/#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>There's now another link to Bill Ward's track layout geometry page, this one from:

http://home.comcast.net/~tamivox/dave/train/

It's not about Lego, but it does look at geometry issues similar to those on Bill's page.

- - Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s now another link to Bill Ward&#8217;s track layout geometry page, this one from:</p>
<p><a href="http://home.comcast.net/~tamivox/dave/train/" rel="nofollow" class="extlink" target="_blank">http://home.comcast.net/~tamivox/dave/train/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about Lego, but it does look at geometry issues similar to those on Bill&#8217;s page.</p>
<p>- - Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
